Past Twilight the back story
The rich: how rich should we let them become.
"Let me tell you
about the very rich. They are different from you and me. They possess and enjoy early, and it does something to
them, makes them soft where we are hard, and cynical where we are trustful, in a way that, unless you were born
rich, it is very difficult to understand. They think, deep in their hearts, that they are better than we are
because we had to discover the compensations and refuges of life for ourselves. Even when they enter deep into our
world or sink below us, they still think that they are better than we are. They are
different." F Scott Fitzgerald
Spring
2011
Twitter Point:
The rich are always going to do better than the rest of us. But if this country doesn't curtail the greed of the
rich, most of us won't be able to afford those made in China bargains from
Walmart.
The main villains of my novel Past Twilight aren't as rich as
the very rich F Scott Fitzgerald is talking about. However, in the town they control, they are the very
rich in that town. They have the greed to become the upper tier rich. They are just not sharp enough to figure out
how to do it.
Certainly, I am not an expert. My opinions are based on a lifetime of
observing how things work or don't work in our society. I have the same knowledge that most of my fellow Americans
should be getting. I'm not going to dish out a lot of facts, because most of the facts a lot of people already know
about. The people in this country are given enough facts. They are not taking the time to interpret the facts. To
many people in this country can't get past political talking points. Maybe someday Apple will invent an app
for their iphones that decodes what pundits and politicians are really saying and which group really benefits from
the nonsense they are spewing over the various medias. Until then you the reader need to find the truth on
your own.
I believe the most crucial thing this country needs to
do, before they can try to solve other problems, is to curb the excesses of the rich. I would even go further and
state that most of the problems of the human race stem from a small group of people who try to have most of the
wealth and power and will do whatever they can get away with to make sure things stay that way. The names may
change but the concept is as old as the human race.
The rich are like that mystical 800-pound gorilla in the
room. They are taking up all the oxygen in the room and everybody is afraid to complain for fear of what that
gorilla might do. Other people are so stupid or grossly not paying attention that they don't even know a gorilla is
in the room. Ridiculous you say, well keep reading and try to give it some thought.
I remember a time when we had a large and prosperous
middle class in this country. We were the envy of the world and number-one in all manufacturing. The rich who
owned manufacturing plant(s) were making a good living, but they weren't making enough profits to satisfy the greed
of some of the owners. The workers in their plants were being paid too much. Especially in the union
plants where the workers had too many health care and pension benefits. Most of these plants were in the
industrial north(the same north whose plants helped our military win world war II). So several plant owners
started moving their plants down south. Here, they would find workers so desperate for a job that they wouldn't
even think about forming a union to get the same pay and benefits of the northern workers. That certainly
worked for a while, until some of the rich started building manufacturing plants in other countries where they
could get their new non-union workers for pennies a day. Some may say the rich moved to other countries because
they couldn't compete with other countries like Japan and China whose governments not only would subsidize their
companies but also made sure it was difficult for America to sell products in those countries but not for American
companies to get rich importing their products into our country. Why can't we tell a country like China that
from now on if we buy x amount of products from your country, we expect to sell the same amount of products to your
country? Hah, hah, bye now you must think I'm on drugs to make such a suggestion. Especially since we
borrowed so much from China to make possible the war against Iraq that the same Chinese wouldn't support in the UN.
Some may think that the Chinese are a lot smarter than us. I don't. I think the rich multi-national American
companies made deals that worked for them at the expense of their fellow Americans. This they never could have done
without the help of our politicians. Have you ever wondered why our country hasn't done the same thing and why only
our unions have been in the forefront of trying to create tariffs for goods coming from those countries? Yes, I
know a tariff is like a tax on goods and that the consumer ends up paying that tax. But what if we used that money
to help increase the manufacturing jobs in this country. What is more important in the long run - cheap goods
or better jobs? The rich and their political lackeys, mostly Republicans but also some Democrats, have labeled
tariffs as 'Protectionism'. Protectionism for who? One thing is certain. Something smells.
Of course if you take away the manufacturing jobs that pay a good salary, who was going to buy their
products. That's when companies like Walmart came along that brought products from countries who had a plentiful
supply of slave labor workers. Now low pay service workers could buy low cost goods from foreign companies
that the rich used to destroy our manufacturing jobs. And that is how we stopped being a nation of
producers and became a nation of consumers. If you don't believe me, check all the products like electronics,
clothes and all the other essentials you need to live on. How many are made in the USA? Even our declining
auto industry, has a lot of their automobile parts made elsewhere. Eventually, all the foreign products are going
to cost a lot more as the living standards in those counties improve. The real question is what is going to happen
when a nation of Walmart employees tries to buy stuff that they no longer can afford to buy? But you say, we are on
our way to becoming a nation of high-tech jobs. Yes, but how many of our citizens are prepared academically or
financially to get the education needed to get one of those high-tech jobs. What kind of country will we have when
we have two classes of citizens: the rich and educated versus the rest of the country. I don't know the
answer to that question, but I bet a lot rich people have the answer.
I'm not saying that everybody should lock and load their 2nd amendment shooting arms and go out
hunting the rich. Further, I'm not saying that all the rich are parasites. Some even have a social conscience, but
I doubt that they are the top tier of the rich. Somebody has to have more money than most of us. Every year million
of Americans buy their lotto tickets in the hope of becoming rich. Money may not solve all our problems, but it is
much better to be rich with problems than to be poor with problems. Would we like a country where everybody
gets the same as everybody else? Of course not, such a country would be totally dysfunctional, because nobody would
have an incentive to do anything. People would look around and see some perceived lazy no-good parasite
getting the same as they do, and they would go nuts. The communist system tried to promote that sort of junk
idea and in the end communism was pretty much destroyed. Even in communism you still had rich people who are living
good off of the backs of the people. The only difference between communism and capitalism is that in communism the
rich didn't get rich enough to satisfy the rich in those countries. I'm sure there are many reasons for the death
of communism, but that would be my favorite reason.
As far as I can tell we have always had rich people on
earth. Even with cavemen someone or someone's were always doing better than the other cavemen. From time to time,
you hear about people protesting in the streets. Doesn't matter what country's people are protesting, it is always
about the haves and the have nots. It's about people who don't have much in life and they want a little of some of
the stuff the rich have in abundance - they want to become middle class. Naturally, the rich are not going to give
anything without a fight. They have spent a lifetime accumulating power and money off of the backs of 'the little
people'. And now 'the little people' have the nerve to want some of that money back.
I believe at some point a person looking to be rich
reaches the point where they have enough money to satisfy all of their wants - even their big time fantasy
wants. At that point, they are only in it to accumulate more money. I believe the term is greed. I believe
greed is an additive disease similar to gambling, drugs or alcohol. Usually most rich people as they get into their
senior years get off this addition. Some become benefactors and proclaim they are now going to help 'the
little people'(of course they never say little people -but clearly, the people who they give the money to are not
on their level, or so they think). Usually, you will see their name on some medical or college building. The new
rich like to do good deeds in those countries around the world that are much poorer than our own. But, and here is
my point, what about all the people in this country who they have screwed or have helped them become rich. They get
nothing because there isn't great PR in helping the people you have screwed or used. And their only friends, fellow
rich people, would call them a traitor and stupid.
So we are always going to have rich people, the only
real question is. How rich should we let the rich become? Without some sort of restraint put on the rich they
will keep getting rich until 'the little people' have no more to give and our country becomes one of those banana
republics that you hear about on TV. Maybe our arm forces will invade us for a regime change. We 'the little
people' either work for the rich or buy the products of the rich. We 'the little people' are the essential
ingredients to becoming rich. Of course, some of us work in the public sector and therefore don't work
directly for the rich, but we do buy the products of the rich. If you pay attention to the news, you can see
that the rich want few public employees. Especially, the rich who made their fortune selling private
contractor services to our local, state and federal agencies. When your local or state politician talks about less
government that is what they are really talking about. Love those no-bid contracts. Cost overruns, no
problem.
Some reform is needed, if only to protect the rich
against themselves. Greed is an addiction and we as a society need to treat it with tough love. If it is true that
the rich don't pay their fair share of taxes because of various loopholes(unlike the rest of us rich people can get
our political reps to change the tax laws in their favor), then we need to eliminate the loopholes. In 2010 the
rich conglomerate GE paid not one cent of tax. While I don't know how they did it, I'm willing to bet $10 that it
was all legal. Imagine you as a private citizen made what GE made in 2010 and you decided not to pay
taxes? One thing the rich would oppose is a flat tax system where depending on how much you make you
pay a percentage of all your earnings(every single way you have made money) in taxes. No deductions of any
kind allowed. One way to find out how a flat tax would work would be to compare how much taxes are currently paid
by the rich compared to a flat tax. The rich, especially those who hide behind their big corporations will always
find ways to get around their obligations to society, but at least some of their excesses, especially the ones that
corrupt our political system will be curved somewhat.
The rich and the politicians who front for them are always
talking about privatizing(read big profits for wall street) social security to save social security. My idea
is different from their idea. If the rich become rich off of the backs of 'little people', then social security can
be a vehicle for giving some of that money back. I believe that there shouldn't be a limit of how much money that
social security takes from the rich. If us 'little people' pay a fixed rate on our wage earnings than so
should the rich. I believe that there should be a limit on how much social security pays back in payments to
the rich. Yes, that's right the rich will help pay for some of the social security payments of us 'little people'.
Some people may call that communism. I just call it justice for 'the little people'. The rich and their political
reps will say if you do this, we are not going to create great products like the iPad. I say let us call their
bluff.
We 'the little people' control how rich we should allow
the rich to become. Unfortunately, we have allowed the rich to operate in a fog, the same fog that criminals use to
cover up their criminal activities. Only the rich have their battalions of lawyers and political lackeys to make
everything seem okey dokey and to shine the light elsewhere. In the ninety's, we had cheating wellfare mothers and
today we have lazy no-good union workers. Both groups in their wildest fantasies couldn't begin to screw us
like the rich have done and will continue to do.
We have been given an overload of information except for
what the rich are doing. We know the names of every bimbo Starlet strung out on drugs, but how much do we really
know about who gets what and why. Until enough American start paying attention, the rich will always be one
step(make that a giant step) ahead of us. Until we lift that fog we will always be the 'little people' with
our hands out expecting something and getting nothing.
Please let your elected officials know how you feel. Copy and
paste your Comments on to their web pages.
http://www.house.gov/representatives/
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact
If you have a web site please list your site's url. It is a good way to improve your SEO
via links from other sites. Also if people like your content they may click on your site and like your site's
content. If you are a author, maybe they might even buy a copy of your
novel.
|
Click to login
Eventually, this will benefit us all when as taxpayers we don't have to pay for the salary of the politicians and their staff that we elect. No, this will be paid by private contributions. Eventually all out government buildings will be sponsored by corporate donations. The White House might be called the Exon Mobile House. The Lincoln bedroom might be called the GE bedroom with imagination. Even Mitt Rommey might get a toilet seat named after him. This might be his only real chance to get into the White House.
Click to login